What do you think of...

[ooo000HITMAN000ooo]

lol nah my next car will be a 1995-1997 bmw 750il, they are the best looking cars on the earth inside and out.

 

[PuShAkOv]

Looks nice in the show room will look normal on the road.

 

[QuickCivicGuy]

LOL you made me want a m coupe now

Hey now....save one for me....

I found a silver one with black wheels that looks like my car

H&R coilovers, slammed....very mean looking....right up my alley

 

[phobiaz]

hehe

 

[codex57]

The M-coupe has nice performance, but I really don't like the hatch. The roadster looks much better.

If you want a new car with the new car warranty, I'd much prefer an Evo or STi. Both will cost the same as the VW and both have better performance. Plus, the aftermarket on those cars are huge.

 

[phobiaz]

i don't plan on putting aftermarket parts on it, i just plan on buying the car and putting a nice sound system and a cold air intake/chip thats about it..... other than that the car will remain stock.... plus i wanna stay a bmw man heh

 

[ooo000HITMAN000ooo]

if you want to save money go for the Z3 coupe.

 

[mrferg]

Is there a Z3 coupe??

 

[manuel]

roadster with a hardtop!

 

[junglestylz]

Actually I just saw a Z3 coupe about twenty minutes ago. The only thing that I have noticed about both the Z3's and the coupes is that their chassis isn't that stiff.

 

[ooo000HITMAN000ooo]

I like the z3 coupes but i am 6.3 dont thing it would have enough leg room...

The ultimate car to me though is a 95-97 750il

 

[codex57]

Yeah, they have Z coupes. Just has the 3.0 liter engine in it. Still a pretty fast car.

 

[mrferg]

I didn't believe it til I saw some pics... now I do.

I seriously never heard of the Z3 coupe...

 

[QuickCivicGuy]

roadster with a hardtop!

Not quite, the Coupes are much much more rigid than the verts the M version is even better

The car to have if your going to put serious power down is the Coupe...the verts are too flimsy compared to the coupes and the weight distribution is better on the Coupe...helps with traction/handling

As far as the evo, sti being better cars....far from the truth stock for stock the M coupe is just as quick as the STI and is a few ticks quicker than the EVO

Factor in you have two extra cyls and a 3.2L motor vs. 2.5L and you can see a turbo M coupe will put a hurting on an STI.....factor in roadcourse duty where the Coupe is just as light if not lighter than the four door counterparts and the M becomes a lapping terror

The one thing I would change (if I could change it) would be the placement of the motor....the M is retro design and uses a long hood FR setup that is very elegant but not as efficient for road course duty as an MR setup....an MR M coupe with a turbo would decimate an EVO on the tarmac

Dont forget the motor is an inline 6 which can rev high, has more displacement and can essentially make more power....its a natural extention of my current civic..more cubes, rwd and lower, wider and meaner

 

[phobiaz]

quickcivic, i love you lol you brought the M-Coupe to mind for me hahah @#!@!#@#!@H#$EI FEHCKNCNZ XCHSHJ#@#@!@ haha hopefully i can find a 2001 though

 

[ooo000HITMAN000ooo]

LOL i did a search for one on autotrader and got like maybe 5

The z3 coupe does 0 to 60 in 5.9

 

[ooo000HITMAN000ooo]

I didn't believe it til I saw some pics... now I do.

I seriously never heard of the Z3 coupe...

I do they are just called a z3

And then the roadster was called the z3 convertable

 

[phobiaz]

why would i want the Z3 coupe... lol i want power thats why i'm going with the M-Coupe

 

[phobiaz]

mmmm

 

[phobiaz]

i dunno about the m-coupe. i'm not to fond of the front of the car. aghhhhhhhhh guys help! lol